Looking for a Covidence Alternative?

What researchers usually look for when switching tools

• Cost — per-seat or per-review pricing can add up quickly for individual researchers, small teams, or students self-funding a review.
• Assisted extraction — pulling study data into structured fields manually is one of the slowest parts of a review.
• Built-in reporting — generating PRISMA flow diagrams and meta-analysis outputs without exporting to separate tools.
• A workflow that covers the whole review — not just screening, but search, extraction, analysis, and manuscript prep in one place.

What EasySystematicReviews includes

• PICO search builder — turn a clinical question into a transparent, auditable Boolean search strategy.
• Multi-database search — search major evidence sources from one consistent workflow.
• Screening workflow — track inclusion/exclusion decisions and reasons with full traceability.
• Automated study extraction — map study details and outcomes into structured fields, with researcher oversight and correction.
• PRISMA / MOOSE flow diagrams — generated automatically from your live screening decisions, always free, never uses credits.
• Meta-analysis and forest plots — export structured data and analysis-ready tables.
• Manuscript generation — draft a journal-style manuscript from your review data.

Pricing

The core review workspace — manual screening, extraction, and PRISMA diagrams — is free, with 50 one-time credits on signup. Paid plans add automated features (study extraction, screening assistance, manuscript generation) starting at ₹1,299/month for active reviewers, with an unlimited plan for high-volume use. See the full pricing breakdown.

Try it on your next review

Create a free account and run a full review — search, screen, extract, and generate your PRISMA diagram — before deciding if it's the right fit.

Start New Review →